The Existence of Amicus Curiae in Constitutional Court Decisions: A Participation Theory Perspective
Abstract
Penelitian ini menganalisis peran dan dampak amicus curiae dalam mendorong proses peradilan yang partisipatif di Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui teori partisipasi. Sebagai mekanisme non-litigasi, amicus curiae memperkaya perspektif peradilan, khususnya dalam kasus-kasus kepentingan publik, dengan memberikan pandangan hukum yang imparsial. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa amicus curiae meningkatkan kualitas putusan, transparansi, dan akuntabilitas, sehingga memperkuat peran Mahkamah dalam mempromosikan sistem hukum yang demokratis dan inklusif. Penelitian ini menyoroti bagaimana amicus curiae mendukung proses peradilan yang partisipatif di Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan menggunakan teori partisipasi. Awalnya berkembang dalam perencanaan kota, teori ini menekankan pada inklusivitas dan akuntabilitas dalam pengambilan keputusan. Diakui dalam Pasal 5 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009, amicus curiae memberikan pandangan imparsial yang berbeda dari Para Pihak Terkait, sehingga memastikan keterwakilan masyarakat yang beragam dalam proses hukum. Kehadiran amicus curiae meningkatkan transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan kualitas putusan peradilan. Teori partisipasi selaras dengan perannya dalam mendorong masukan publik yang beragam untuk mencapai hasil hukum yang seimbang. Kasus-kasus penting, seperti persidangan Soeharto, menunjukkan nilai praktisnya dalam memastikan keadilan peradilan. Institusionalisasi amicus curiae memperkuat nilai-nilai demokrasi dan partisipasi publik dalam peradilan. Amicus curiae memainkan peran strategis dalam meningkatkan transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan inklusivitas peradilan di Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Kata kunci: Mahkamah Konstitusi, Amicus curiae, Partisipasi Publik, Transparansi, Akuntabilitas
This study analyzes the role and impact of amicus curiae in fostering participatory judicial processes within the Constitutional Court through participation theory. As a non-litigation mechanism, amicus curiae enrich judicial perspectives, particularly in cases of public interest, by providing impartial legal insights. Findings reveal that amicus curiae enhances decision quality, transparency, and accountability, reinforcing the Court’s role in promoting a democratic and inclusive legal system. This study highlights how amicus curiae support participatory judicial processes within the Constitutional Court, using participation theory. Initially rooted in urban planning, this theory emphasizes inclusivity and accountability in decision-making. Recognized under Article 5 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 48 of 2009, amicus curiae provide impartial insights distinct from Related Parties, ensuring diverse societal representation in legal processes. The inclusion of amicus curiae enhances judicial transparency, accountability, and decision quality. Participation theory aligns with its role in fostering diverse public input for balanced legal outcomes. Notable cases, such as the Soeharto trial, demonstrate its practical value in ensuring judicial fairness. Institutionalizing amicus curiae strengthens democratic values and public participation in the judiciary. Amicus curiae plays a strategic role in enhancing judicial transparency, accountability, and inclusivity in the Constitutional Court. Its alignment with participation theory underscores its importance in promoting constitutional justice and addressing public interest cases.
Keywords: Constitutional Court; Amicus curiae; Public Participation, Transparency, Accountability
References
Abi-Hassan, S., Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Christenson, D. P., Kaufman, A. R., & Libgober, B. (2023). The Ideologies of Organized Interests and Amicus Curiae Briefs: Large-Scale, Social Network Imputation of Ideal Points. Political Analysis, 31(3), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2022.34
Arnstein, S. (2020). BUILDING “A LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION.” Learning from Arnstein’s Ladder: From Citizen Participation to Public Engagement, 2.
Ayu Pralampita, L. (2020). Kedudukan Amicus Curiae Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss3.art4
Bagashka, T., Chapa, S., & Tiede, L. (2024). Influenced by Power or Reasons? The Role of Amicus Curiae Briefs in Constitutional Court Decision-Making. East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures, 38(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254221148485
Canelo, K. S. (2022). The Supreme Court, Ideology, and the Decision to Cite or Borrow from Amicus Curiae Briefs. American Politics Research, 50(2), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X211032111
DeMatteo, D., & Wiltsie, K. (2022). When Amicus Curiae Briefs are Inimicus Curiae Briefs: Amicus Curiae Briefs and the Bypassing of Admissibility Standards. Am. UL Rev., 72, 1871.
Diantha, M. P. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Prenada Media. https://inlislite.uin-suska.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=23284
Dias Simões, F. (2021). Public Participation: Amicus Curiae in International Investment Arbitration. In J. Chaisse, L. Choukroune, & S. Jusoh (Eds.), Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy (pp. 1371–1396). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3615-7_13
Doerfler, M. E. (2023). Bishops and Friends: History and Legal Interpretation in Recent Amicus Curiae Briefs before the Supreme Court. Journal of Law and Religion, 38(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2022.47
Farber, S. (2024a). “Amicus Curiae”—Definitions and Interpretations. In S. Farber, The Amicus Curiae Phenomenon (Vol. 119, pp. 31–57). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67225-5_2
Farber, S. (2024b). The Advantages and Disadvantages of the Amicus. In S. Farber, The Amicus Curiae Phenomenon (Vol. 119, pp. 59–81). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67225-5_3
Farber, S. (2024c). The Historical Development of “Amicus Curiae” and the Reasons for Its Emergence. In S. Farber, The Amicus Curiae Phenomenon (Vol. 119, pp. 83–102). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67225-5_4
Hamidi, A., Asasriwarni, A., & Matondang, I. (2022). The Relationship Between Religion and The State in Indonesia, and Its Relation to Islamic Law. NEGREI: Academic Journal of Law and Governance, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.29240/negrei.v2i1.3783
Hasannudin, M. I., & Rahayu, A. Y. S. (2022). PERANAN AMICUS CURIAE PADA PUTUSAN GUGATAN TERHADAP PROSES SELEKSI CALON HAKIM AGUNG. Jurnal Yudisial, 15(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v15i1.533
Husein, Z. A. M. (2016). Kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia: Sejarah, kedudukan, fungsi, dan pelaksanaan kekuasaan kehakiman dalam perspektif konstitusi (R. Yasin, Ed.; Cetakan pertama). Setara Press.
Johnson, B. G., Thomas, R. J., & Fuzy, J. P. (2021). Beyond Journalism about Journalism: Amicus Briefs as Metajournalistic Discourse. Journalism Practice, 15(7), 937–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1758590
Kearney, J. D., & Merrill, T. W. (1999). Influence of amicus curiae briefs on the Supreme Court. U. Pa. L. Rev., 148, 743.
Krenn, C. (2022). The Procedural and Organisational Law of the European Court of Justice: An Incomplete Transformation (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009247924
Krislov, S. (1962). The amicus curiae brief: From friendship to advocacy. Yale LJ, 72, 694.
Krisnalita, L. Y., Mutiarany, M., Sharon, G., & Mohamad, A. M. (2022). The Legal Position of Amicus Curiae’s Opinion on Criminal Judicial Processes in Indonesia. Justitia Jurnal Hukum, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.30651/justitia.v7i1.12807
McCammon, H. J., Sudibjo, M. N., Beeson-Lynch, C., Brockman, A. J., & Moon, M. (2022). Feminist Friends of the Court: Amicus Curiae, Social Movement Institutional Activism, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s Women’s Rights Cases. Sociological Focus, 55(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2021.2009074
Montoya, A. (2024). Citizens as lawmakers: Legal innovation and the competing moralities of environmental juridification. The International Journal of Human Rights, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2024.2410835
Muhaimin, M. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. UPT. Mataram University Press.
Mulia, A. Y. (2024). Amicus Curiae di Mahkamah Konstitusi. JALAKOTEK: Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology, 1(2), 375–376. https://doi.org/10.57235/jalakotek.v1i2.2400
O’Brien, M., Rosenthal, I., & Grey, R. (2022). Historic feminist intervention at the International Criminal Court—The appeals hearing in Prosecutor v Dominic Ongwen. Australian Journal of Human Rights, 28(1), 176–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238X.2022.2076547
Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2 C.E.). Tahun 2021 tentang Tata Beracara Dalam Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang.
Sucipta, D. H., & Darma, I. M. W. (2022). AMICUS CURIAE AS THE DEVELOPMENT OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 7(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v7i1.576
Sulistyowati, Mery, L., Maharani, D. N., & Andika, A. (2024). The Urgency of Amicus Curiae in The Indonesian Law (A Case Study of the 2024 Presidential Election Dispute). Alauddin Law Development Journal, 6(3), 578–587. https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v6i3.51252
Thomas, J., & Liman, V. (2024). Analysis Of Opportunities For Implementing The Amicus Curiae Concept As A Form Of Public Participation In The Judicial System In Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 13(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.13.1.2024.1-32
Zuhdi, A., & Kamula, A. A. (2024). Legitimasi Hukum Asing Sebagai Pertimbangan Putusan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Perbandingan Antara Indonesia dan Afrika Selatan. Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang, 7(2), 272–296. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v7i2.21634
