INTEGRASI ADMINISTRASI PENDIDIKAN DALAM MENINGKATKAN EFEKTIVITAS PENGELOLAAN MADRASAH: STUDI KASUS DI MIS AR RUM MEDAN MARELAN
Abstract
Administrasi pendidikan berperan penting dalam meningkatkan efektivitas tata kelola madrasah, tetapi berbagai penelitian terdahulu masih membahas administrasi kurikulum, peserta didik, tenaga kependidikan, sarana prasarana, keuangan, dan hubungan masyarakat secara terpisah. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis integrasi berbagai komponen administrasi pendidikan dalam meningkatkan efektivitas pengelolaan MIS Ar Rum Medan Marelan. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus intrinsik yang dilaksanakan pada Februari–April 2026. Data diperoleh melalui observasi nonpartisipatif, wawancara semi-terstruktur terhadap 12 informan yang dipilih secara purposif, dan analisis dokumen. Data dianalisis menggunakan model interaktif melalui kondensasi data, penyajian data, serta penarikan dan verifikasi kesimpulan. Keabsahan data dijaga melalui triangulasi sumber dan teknik, pemeriksaan anggota, diskusi sejawat, dan penelusuran audit. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas pengelolaan madrasah dibentuk oleh keterhubungan administrasi kurikulum, peserta didik, tenaga pendidik dan kependidikan, sarana prasarana, keuangan, serta hubungan madrasah dengan masyarakat. Namun, keterbatasan tenaga administrasi, tingginya beban administratif guru, pengelolaan arsip manual, dan belum optimalnya digitalisasi masih menjadi hambatan. Penelitian ini menegaskan administrasi pendidikan sebagai sistem tata kelola terintegrasi yang mendukung koordinasi, akuntabilitas, dan efektivitas pelayanan madrasah.
References
Abdul-Hamid, H. (2017). Data for Learning: Building a Smart Education Data System. In Data for Learning: Building a Smart Education Data System. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1099-2
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
El-Ali, L. (2022). No Truth Without Beauty: God, the Qur’an, and Women’s Rights. In Sustainable Development Goals Series: Vol. Part F2695. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83582-8
Hallinger, P. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 46(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216670652
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2019). Conceptual and methodological issues in studying school leadership effects as a reciprocal process. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(2), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2011.565777
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill. https://www.mheducation.com/highered/product/educational-administration-theory-research-and-practice-hoy.html
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership and Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
Mark, & Hay, I. (2011). Research Ethics for Social Scientists. In Research Ethics for Social Scientists. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209779
Merrill, S. (2020). Theories of Educational Leadership and Management, 3rd edn. Journal of In-Service Education, 30(1), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580400200457
Miles, H. & S. (2015). Qualitative Data A Methods Sourcebook. In Etika Jurnalisme Pada Koran Kuning : Sebuah Studi Mengenai Koran Lampu Hijau (4th ed., Vol. 16, Issue 2). SAGE Publications.
Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091
O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
OECD. (2023). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2023: Towards an Effective Digital Education Ecosystem. In OECD Digital Education Outlook. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b14bef59-en
Rajasekaran, S., Adam, T., & Tilmes, K. (2024). Digital Pathways for Education: Enabling Greater Impact for All. In Digital Pathways for Education: Enabling Greater Impact for All. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/42386
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality and Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
Scheerens, J. (2015). Educational effectiveness and ineffectiveness: A critical review of the knowledge base. In Educational Effectiveness and Ineffectiveness: A Critical Review of the Knowledge Base. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7459-8
Schildkamp, K. (2019). Data-based decision-making for school improvement: Research insights and gaps. Educational Research, 61(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1625716
Türkoğlu, M. E., & Cansoy, R. (2022). School Principals’ Opinions on the Meaning and Sources of Workload. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(1), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.657994
UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? In Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? https://doi.org/10.54676/uzqv8501
W. Cresswell, J., & N. Poth, C. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Yin K. Robert. (2018). Case Study Research and Design and Methods. In SAGE Publications (6th ed., Vol. 5). SAGE Publications.
.png)
.png)
