IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN LITERASI DIGITAL DALAM MENCEGAH DISINFORMASI DAN MENINGKATKAN ETIKA KOMUNIKASI MAHASISWA DI PERGURUAN TINGGI
Abstract
Transformasi komunikasi digital di perguruan tinggi memperluas akses mahasiswa terhadap pengetahuan, tetapi sekaligus meningkatkan paparan terhadap disinformasi, manipulasi visual, ujaran kebencian, pelanggaran privasi, dan praktik komunikasi yang tidak etis. Karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis implementasi kebijakan literasi digital dalam mencegah disinformasi dan meningkatkan etika komunikasi mahasiswa dengan menelaah desain kebijakan, pelaksanaan program, faktor pendukung dan penghambat, serta model penguatan yang relevan bagi perguruan tinggi. Penelitian menggunakan kajian literatur integratif terhadap 32 sumber ilmiah dan dokumen kebijakan yang diterbitkan pada 2020–2025, ditelusuri melalui basis data ilmiah dan situs lembaga resmi, kemudian dianalisis melalui pemetaan sumber, pengodean tematik, perbandingan antarsumber, dan sintesis argumentatif. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan literasi digital yang efektif tidak cukup dilaksanakan melalui seminar insidental, tetapi harus diintegrasikan ke dalam kurikulum, pembelajaran berbasis kasus, layanan perpustakaan, tata kelola kemahasiswaan, komunikasi kelembagaan, teknologi informasi, dan mekanisme penanganan pelanggaran; model yang dihasilkan mencakup lima dimensi, yaitu regulasi, pendidikan, budaya, teknologi, dan akuntabilitas, dengan keberhasilan yang ditentukan oleh komitmen pimpinan, kompetensi dosen, kolaborasi lintas unit, partisipasi mahasiswa, serta evaluasi berkelanjutan.
References
Becker, J. (1982). Joint Research Centre. In Nature (Vol. 296, Issue 5855). Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.1038/296283c0
Boonlue, S. (2024). Guidance for Generative Ai in Education and Research" for Teachers. In Journal of Industrial Education (Vol. 23, Issue 2). UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.55003/jie.23202
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Frau-Meigs, D. (2024). User empowerment through Media and Information Literacy responses to the evolution of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000388547
Guess, A. M., Lerner, M., Lyons, B., Montgomery, J. M., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., & Sircar, N. (2020). A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(27), 15536–15545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920498117
Huang, G., Jia, W., & Yu, W. (2024). Media Literacy Interventions Improve Resilience to Misinformation: A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Overall Effect and Moderating Factors. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241288103
Jones-Jang, S. M., Mortensen, T., & Liu, J. (2021). Does Media Literacy Help Identification of Fake News? Information Literacy Helps, but Other Literacies Don’t. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869406
Kops, M., Schittenhelm, C., & Wachs, S. (2025). Young people and false information: A scoping review of responses, influential factors, consequences, and prevention programs. Computers in Human Behavior, 169, 108650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108650
Luo, Y. F., Yang, S. C., & Kang, S. (2022). New media literacy and news trustworthiness: An application of importance–performance analysis. Computers and Education, 185, 104529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104529
McGrew, S. (2024). Teaching lateral reading: Interventions to help people read like fact checkers. Current Opinion in Psychology, 55, 101737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101737
OECD. (2024). Facts not Fakes: Tackling Disinformation, Strengthening Information Integrity. In Facts not Fakes: Tackling Disinformation, Strengthening Information Integrity. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d909ff7a-en
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Medicine, 18(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1003583
Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention. Psychological Science, 31(7), 770–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939054
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The Psychology of Fake News. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
Roozenbeek, J., van der Linden, S., Goldberg, B., Rathje, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2022). Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social media. Science Advances, 8(34), 6254. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abo6254
Scheibenzuber, C., Hofer, S., & Nistor, N. (2021). Designing for fake news literacy training: A problem-based undergraduate online-course. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106796
Spante, M., Hashemi, S. S., Lundin, M., & Algers, A. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1519143
Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Using the Past and Present to Explore the Future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606
UNESCO. (2021a). AI and education: guidance for policy-makers. In AI and education: guidance for policy-makers. https://doi.org/10.54675/pcsp7350
UNESCO. (2021b). Media and information literacy: Curriculum for educators and learners (updated guidance). UNESCO.
Wardle, C. (2018). The Need for Smarter Definitions and Practical, Timely Empirical Research on Information Disorder. Digital Journalism, 6(8), 951–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1502047
Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2019). Lateral reading and the nature of expertise: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Teachers College Record, 121(11), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912101102
Zhao, Y., Pinto Llorente, A. M., & Sánchez Gómez, M. C. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education, 168, 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212
.png)
.png)
